In Essence It Is 2 Goods That Can Be Exchanged And Both Are Connected. If The Price Of One Increases, So Does The Price Of The Other. The Same Applies To A Decrease.
According To Wikipedia
“Classic Examples Of Substitute Goods Include Margarine And Butter, Or Petroleum And Natural Gas (Used For Heating Or Electricity). The Fact That One Good Is Substitutable For Another Has Immediate Economic Consequences: Insofar As One Good Can Be Substituted For Another, The Demand For The Two Kinds Of Good Will Be Bound Together By The Fact That Customers Can Trade Off One Good For The Other If It Becomes Advantageous To Do So.
According To The Economist
“In Terms Of Demand (That Is, Substitute-In-Consumption), One Of Two Goods That Replace Each Other In Consumption Such That An Increase In The Price Of One Good Leads To An Increase In Demand And A Rightward Shift In The Demand Curve For The Other Good. If The Demand Of Good 1 Increases As The Price Of Good 2 Increases, The Goods Are Substitutes-In-Consumption. In Terms Of Supply (That Is, Substitute-In-Production), One Of Two Goods That Replace Each Other In Either Producing Using The Same Resources In An Either/Or Fashion, Such That An Increase In The Price Of One Good Leads To A Decrease In Supply And A Leftward Shift In The Supply Curve For The Other Good. If The Supply Of Good 1 Decreases As The Price Of Good 2 Increases, The Goods Are Substitutes-In-Production.”
Complementary (Goods)
Hot Dog Vs Hot Dog Bun
The Price Of One Drops So People Want To Buy Both For Cheaper
Aggregate
A Collection Of Items That Are Gathered To Make Up A Whole
The Collective Whole
Scarcity
Not Enough Supply To Meet The Demand
Microeconomics
Individual Industries
Looking At One Specific Business
The Coffee Industry, Starbucks, Wal-Mart, Etc
The Small Picture
Macroeconomics
Looking At Nation Wide
The Big Picture
Efficiently Is The Ratio Of The Output To The Input Of Any System
If You Are A Lawyer For A Long Period Of Time Do You Go To Court Less Or More Often?
It Depends On What Field You Are In. But In The Beginning You May Be In Court More Often As You Get Older Than You Hopefully Learn How To Stay Out Of Court. Or You May Handle More Customers. Over Half Of The Graduated May Never Go Into Court However As They Assist Other People But Never Go To Court.
What Led You To Become A Lawyer?
One Was In Business School And Needed Further Education. Had To Choose Between MBA Or Law. At The Time MBA Were Just Coming On So He Chose Law To Be Different.
One Had A Lawyer As A Father And Read A Lot Of The Material To Read, Ad Losing Arguments With His Father.
Worse Part Of Being A Lawyer?
When A Good Person Comes In And Is Basically Screwed.
E.G. A Person Who Sells Alcohol To A Minor Unknowingly
There Is Some Limitations On Their Rights.
Cohesion Vs. Interrogation
Concept Is The Same But The Degree Is Different.
Interrogation Is More Breaking Down Of A Person’s Mind.
Cohesion Is Convincing Them To Give Information.
State Vs Federal Power
It Always Depends On The Circumstances Of The Crime
Location Of The Crime, Type Of Crime, Who Is Involved.
How Does Double Jeopardy Work
If You Are Charged Once For A Criminal Crime, Once The Trial Is Over, Guilty Or Innocent, The Same Crime Cannot Be Charged Again.
It Is Made So That One Person Cannot Be Charged Over And Over If A Jury Keeps Finding Them Innocent If The Prosecutor Wants Them To Be Guilty.
In The Case Of Miranda V Arizona, Miranda Was Convicted Of The Same Crime Twice.
If A Officer Goes Into A House Looking For One Thing (With A Warrant) But Found Another Is It Still Admissible
If It Is Open And Obvious Than It Is Admissible.
If The Found The First Thing, They Have Executed Their Warrant, Now They Should Leave.
If An Illegal Substance Found They Can Either Prosecute It In The Same Crime Or Another Charge Altogether.
What If An Illegal Substance Was Found While The Warrant Was Being Looked For?
Most Likely There Would Be A Conviction.
Also If It Falls Out Of Something Into The Open Than It Is Admissible.
>Side Note
*Things Like Murder And Abduction Among Others May Not Have A Statute Of Limitations.
If You Know A Person Is Guilty Can You Opt Out Of A Case?
If You Are Told To Take The Case Than You Have To Do The Very Best That You Can. If You Throw Them Under The Bus Than You Can Have Your License Taken,
If They Know That The Person Is Going To Lie Than They Can Say That The Person Is Going To Tell The Events In Their Own Words So That They Are Basically Not Assisting The Lie.
Does Arizona Use The Daubert Vs. Frye Standard?
Arizona Follows Its Own Path. It Looks To See If It Is Sufficient Enough.
In Most Cases It May Be Up To The Judge To Decide To Make The Evidence Admissibe Or Not.
What If One Side Of A Trial Outpowers The Other Via Money Etc.
E.G. A Corporation Vs. A Common Person.
Only One Lawyer Gets To Speak On Each Side In Court.
Also The Jury Will See That One Side Kills The Other.
In The End The Person Who Can Pull Out More Stuff And Look Under Every Rock Than The Other Side.
What If One Side Decides To Pull Out The Case To Basically Kill The Finds Of The Other.
Contingency, To Hire A Lawyer And They Only Get Paid If They Win.
Courts Can Set Deadlines So They Can Move The Trial Forward.
What If An Expert Witness Publishes An Article Previously And It Is Different From What They Are Currently Are Saying?
The Article Can Be Used To Weaken The Reputation Of The Expert.
Also The Expert Can Explain The Difference From The Past To The Present.
Double Jeopardy Vs. Appeal.
An Appeal Is The Same Case But In Another Court.
Double Jeopardy Is When It Is An Entire New Case.
If It Is Almost The Same Crime With Sight Tweaks, There Can Be An Argument On Whether It Is Double Jeopardy Or A New Crime.
Why Do Some Courts People Swear On The Bible?
In Most Arizona Courts You Just Raise Your Right Hand To Affirm To Tell The Truth
The Idea Is You Are Going To Tell The Truth As You Have Sworn On You Higher Belief.
In Arizona It Is Our Constitutional Right That We Cannot Be Asked About Our Belief In God.
It Doesn’t Matter Anyways Because If You Lie Than You Can Trial Them For Perjury.
Why Is It In Arizona We Lie Detectors Admissible.
Because Most People Done See Them As Reliable
What Is The Biggest Flaw In The Law System?
People Don’t Have Full Access To The System As It Is Over They Costs.
In Other Cases Amounts Being Disputed Are Just Too Small That No One Cares
When It Comes To Illegal Immigrants Can You Ask?
There Are Some Law Firms That Do Ask But Most People Don’t Ask. They Are Fully Allowed To But There Is No Reason To Ask. It Depends On The Lawyer. Immigratons Lawyers May Need To Know.
Are There Any Cases That Have Stuck To The Back Of Your Mind?
An Elderly Couple Owned A Hallmark Card Shop On An Indian Reservation. The Space Next To It Was Empty. Someone Wanted That Piece And A Third Of The Shop. In The Night They Moved Everything And Basically Hijacked The Shop.
After A Complex Case They Got Beaten In The Court. (They Were Basically Plowed Over)
Representing A Sheriffs’ Deputy That Got Ran Over By A Criminal
Got His Pelvis Basically Maimed
They Take Him To The Hospital And Got Tons Of Surgery
Than He Went To A Rehab Hospital, And Mistreated Him
The Hospital Denied It.
Bent The Plates And Pulled The Screws.
Most Interesting Part Was Opening Statement
Halfway Through The Opening Statement One Of Jurors Passes Out As He Is Talking About Screws Being Pulled Out Of A Pelvis, Bending Metal Plates, Etc.
We’ve Two Weeks In The Books And It’s Time Look Back. Where Do You Stand? (Are You Going “Above And Beyond”, “Basically Fine” Or “Could You Do Better”?) As You Think About These Things Also Consider The Following:
There Is Always More To Do…
One Of The Major Aspects Of This Class Will Be Your Reliance On The People Around You To Enhance Your Learning As You Work Together To Share Perspectives, Ideas Connections, Insight And Knowledge
So, With Regards To Participation, What Have You Done Well And What Could You Have Done Better? To Put This In Other Terms, If You Continued On Your Current Path, Doing Nothing More And Nothing Less, How Successful Will You Be?
Finally, Set Two Goals For Yourself For The Next Two Weeks. As You Think About These Goals, Be Reasonable. We Are More Likely To Change Small Things Than We Are Toa Make Sweeping Changes As The Later Rarely Last.
Logistics
Type Your Self-Assessment / Reflection In A Word Document And Save It As Follows:
Lastname_Firstname_Ges_Sar.Doc
You Will Need A Document Such As This For Each Of Your Classes. If You’ve Not Already Set Up Folders And Some Level Of Organization, Do It Now.
This Will Be An Ongoing Document / Dialogue / Discussion About Your Learning Journey. For Now, You Will Have Only Two Weeks On Which To Reflect. For Our Next Sar, You Will Have Goals (Set Here) And An Additional Two-Week Chunk To Ponder. This Is Not To Say That You Are Only Thinking About This Specific Two-Week Chunk, But Rather The Entire Journey Thus Far As Well As Your Efforts In Reaching Your Goals. Just Like A Blog, The Most Recent Entries Will Be At The Top Of The Document.
This Is Due Before The End Of Class, Friday, August 13.
Each type of government has its advantages and disadvantages. They all try to establish some kind of order for the most part (with a few exceptions). They want to create order and some do achieve it while some fail. They rely on the people to follow some kind of leader that has power.
I would say the easiest is an anarchy because there is no order. Everyone is free to do as they wish and no one can stop them but themselves. It would also be the worst because there is no order and no one but the people governs themselves.
Most civilized would have to be a Republic as the people have a say in what happens. The people control themselves and there are balances between people.
“Democracy is itself, a religious faith. For some it comes close to being the only formal religion they have” -E.B. White
This is saying that people want this type of government because it works and they will fight for it. This can apply to the other government types as well as long as the people want it to survive.
"What is democracy?"
In the way me implement a democracy it is a combination of multiple government types. We see a republic because the citizens are involved in the government itself. A constitutional monarchy can be seen in the executive branch, a leader who has power and follows a construction to make decisions.
